<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Empower the Consumer via Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elyrosenstock.com/2008/10/29/empower-the-consumer-via-transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elyrosenstock.com/2008/10/29/empower-the-consumer-via-transparency/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=empower-the-consumer-via-transparency</link>
	<description>Formerly Crastinate.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:23:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethical Businesses Shouldn&#8217;t Have to be Socially Responsible &#171; Crastinate</title>
		<link>http://elyrosenstock.com/2008/10/29/empower-the-consumer-via-transparency/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethical Businesses Shouldn&#8217;t Have to be Socially Responsible &#171; Crastinate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crastinate.wordpress.com/?p=230#comment-619</guid>
		<description>[...] but have an OBLIGATION to create positive social change. I disagree with this. I think that consumer transparency is important and you have an obligation to be honest with your consumers. On the other hand, if I [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but have an OBLIGATION to create positive social change. I disagree with this. I think that consumer transparency is important and you have an obligation to be honest with your consumers. On the other hand, if I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ely Rosenstock</title>
		<link>http://elyrosenstock.com/2008/10/29/empower-the-consumer-via-transparency/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Ely Rosenstock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crastinate.wordpress.com/?p=230#comment-618</guid>
		<description>From what I understand, I think it&#039;s good thing. But the UL certification is just a standard to meet to get the certification seal. There isn&#039;t a rating scale based on how good or bad something is. So the attribute people are looking as it whether seal is there or not. That is a safety thing. I think for larger social issues, we need rating scales so we can evaluate products based on how much they affect these issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I understand, I think it&#8217;s good thing. But the UL certification is just a standard to meet to get the certification seal. There isn&#8217;t a rating scale based on how good or bad something is. So the attribute people are looking as it whether seal is there or not. That is a safety thing. I think for larger social issues, we need rating scales so we can evaluate products based on how much they affect these issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://elyrosenstock.com/2008/10/29/empower-the-consumer-via-transparency/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crastinate.wordpress.com/?p=230#comment-617</guid>
		<description>I would make the comparison of companies that have to get approval through the Underwriter&#039;s Laboratory (UL).  The have to pay for the inspection process (test, or whatever method for approval from UL) and they have are able to place the UL approval on there product, pamphlets, etc.  What&#039;s your opinion on that, since it considers inspection, approval, and a visual to consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would make the comparison of companies that have to get approval through the Underwriter&#8217;s Laboratory (UL).  The have to pay for the inspection process (test, or whatever method for approval from UL) and they have are able to place the UL approval on there product, pamphlets, etc.  What&#8217;s your opinion on that, since it considers inspection, approval, and a visual to consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

